Disrupting Dominant Discourses
The role of mapping in understanding Nicosia's Conflict otherwise
Keywords:
Critical Mapping, Critical Spatial Practices, Urban Conflict, Inclusive Urban Futures, NicosiaAbstract
This study examines the role of mapping in visualizing hidden aspects of geopolitical conflicts and influencing their interpretation. Focusing on the divided city of Nicosia, the capital of Cyprus, this paper investigates how alternative cartographic representations can challenge dominant power dynamics and reveal overlooked narratives within divided urban landscapes. Traditionally, maps have been tools for colonial powers to assert territorial claims, often depicting rigid geopolitical boundaries. However, they can also be utilized to uncover the dual nature of Nicosia’s division — characterized by both permeability and impermeability. This paper uses maps to highlight aspects of the conflict often overlooked, such as spaces for grassroots peace actions and other elements of the divided urban environment that shape the city’s spatial, societal, and bi-communal dynamics. The research aims to explore mapping as both a tool and a method for understanding the division and its manifestation on the ground. It posits that maps are active mediators capable of conveying intention and transforming perceptions of urban conflicts and their spatial representation. These new representations enable a holistic comprehension of the on-the-ground conditions, potentially leading to transformative action in addressing the conflict.